MGMT455 U1 IP Theory X & Y Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

MGMT455 U1 IP theory X & Y - Research Paper ExampleThis scheme tends to adopt the authoritarian style of management. Whereas, guess Y assumes that individuals take responsibility and they do not submit control and direction on each step, they are active, motivated and consider the work as the inborn part of their lives, and are capable of achieving higher goals in their jobs. This theory is considered is the participative style of management.One style cannot be functiond in all situations. It totally depends on the circumstances and conditions of the environment and employees. The management can be authoritative in some cases and can also be practical in other cases spot a mix of both the theories can result better. The practices of Theory Y can turn come out with better results as this will develop confidence and courage among the employees to work in a relaxed and a comfortable environment. For-example, well and high structured call center operations can get a certain amoun t of benefits by accepting their employees to perform and respond to customers on their comfort and knowledge level. So, by adapting to Theory Y practices they can appreciate and encourage the overall knowledge sharing processes.The difference between Theory X and Theory Y management is quite noticeable. In my opinion, the management of Theory Y is lots more effective and productive than Theory X, as the authoritarian management of Theory X is lots adopted in most of the huge firms and organization and leaves less comfortable environment for the employees, whereas most of the organizations allow participative management of the employees which prefer self motivation and appreciate new ideas from the individuals. Considering Theory Y management, many of the organizations use decision making processes, in which each employee has the opportunity to share his thoughts and ideas.There are basically deuce major types of democratic decision making, including, persuasive democratic manageme nt and consultative